Video content marketing is one thing which is certainly not going to go away. Google is promptly using what they call the universal search everyplace they're indexing videos from outlets like Google Video and You Tube right away to their search results. Video website giant YouTube. If you would like to dominate video marketing, you will find several simple i7 group espaol steps that you simply need to become following that will help you have better outcomes. Watch other viral videos to ensure that you can pick http://www.careerbuilder.com/jobs-marketing up trends that make sure they are go viral.
SmartErrors powered by CloudflarePrivacy policy. If they are already in an opportunity, then they don't want to listen to about another opportunity. So, film away when your done transfer the digital file to your laptop.
o Who is viewing your videos?o What can the y want?o Are you giving them what they want?. In short, almost all the Internet's resources are now being used on this brand of marketing. Technorati will explain to you how many links happen to be d per video by people including the video on their very own blogs.
It is achievable for businesses to exist online without a website, for example with directory listings much like The Yellow Pages, but for your most part digital marketing is built round the promotion of your company website. The decision to make use of Internet marketing as part of the company's overall online strategy is strictly up towards the company of course, but as a rule, Internet marketing is becoming an increasingly important a part of nearly every company's marketing mix. There are videos that receive a great deal of traffic on a regular basis. It's best not to answer that question, the rhetoric would ta ke too long.
Video marketing is among the most useful forms of viral and internet based marketing. She holds i7 group espaol a PHD on paper from Cambridge. There are 5 methods to maximise your investment, increase your brand/image & drive more visitors to your website.
First you Best Home Improvement College Station have to put together your mold. There are several ways this can be achieved. Many people use RTV in either poly or silicon based units to create their two part molds, by making a negative of the part you are going to copy. Take for instance the question in my comments: broken lawn darts. This casting set should likely be in three pieces to allow for easy separation of each Fletch vane. I would use the best of the darts. Oil them with WD-40 or other slippery substance that silicone would not stick to. Next smear a very liberal amount of RTV on six small pieces of quarter inch paneling board. Make sure there will not be any bubbles.
Then carefully place each wet silicone piece onto the fletch vanes, making sure that all areas of the lawn dart are covered. It would be good to mark the individual pieces now with a marker. Wait a day or so for t he RTV to cure. Using a utility knife, carefully separate the individual pieces. Hindsight in my own mistakes says to make sure you have also bonded the six pieces into three with a bracing piece. This can be siliconed in place as well, but make sure that your vanes are spaced evenly. Doing this properly will help in making sure your parts align properly Home Improvement College Station for the next steps.
Once you have removed the original lawn dart from the mold, use your knife to open three small weep holes on the fletching edge of each vane. Next clamp your mold pieces together in the proper order. Then using a liquified plastic solution, usually created by dissolving the proper plastic into a solution of plastic weld glue. For the thin vanes of the fletching, particulate powder can be used, but being consistent in the fletching will be next to impossible. The ideal scenario would be to use the injection method aft er softening the injected plastic.
With this said, metal tipped lawn darts have been banned from use in the US and Canada because of injury and death. Parts can be imported, but kits and complete units are impounded by customs. This is not something to make to sell. However, this product is like the proper handling of a handgun. Education is essential for proper use. Use common sense. Anyone participating in a lawn dart game must understand that in 1988 the Trade Commission banned them after three deaths and a seven year old boy in Indiana suffered irreparable brain damage due to the metal tipped lawn darts.
Other Ideas
You could also use a ceramic or metal form to pour your liquid or powdered plastic into then heat or let set. Now let me be clear I'm not only saying a form made from metal or ceramic. I'm saying that the form could be made of anything as long as it with stood the heat of the molding process. Scrap wood can easily be shaped by standard wood worki ng tools and made into the negative of your part. Of course, RTV Silicone mentioned above is a decently cheap method if you do not mind the smell.
For one piece molds, there are any number of ways to vacu-form your molds, using old vacuum cleaners and ovens to soften the plastic you will use for your mold. This might be handy for making a repair piece for an old doll or http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/remodeling action figure. It is a method used often times by the plastic modelling community for numerous parts.
The four basic types of molding (particulate, pour, vacuu-forming and injection) could be used for a long time for manufacturing.
But are you going to mass produce your project? Are you going to need a quick setting system for a more rapid production?
Injection molding alone is used for many different industries. In essence, Injection Molding is using a machine to squeeze the hot or chemically melted plastic into the mold. Injection molding mated to the particulate molding process, can speed your production considerably, as well as, as mentioned before, quite possibly making a stronger product. Keeping your equipment clean helps keep the fumes at bay as well. Stray plastic material can out gas for a long time after it has melted, and every time it is heated releases even more fumes.
I had thought that by this time I would have figured out a better system but arc heating and torch/flame heating are out of the question because of keeping the fumes to a minimum. So for now I use an array of several old soldering irons that are placed strategically around the mold to help in the even heating. However, that is a very inefficient system so I have been working on a new one that uses a small chamber and direct blown heat from that chamber.
Most old style irrigation or watering sprinkler control systems are a pain to set up and difficult to reprogram with lots of fiddly sub routines https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhxCu6cQBMs to go through. The result is usually that because it is such a nuisance to reprogram you don't change the settings and waste lots of water. In the summer months as much as about two thirds of home water usage is outside and most is probably wasted due to overwatering. It doesn't do your lawn or your bank balance any good.
A web based sprinkler controller like the IrrigationCaddy ICEthS1 is the first step towards a proper home smart irrigation controller because it is easy to change the times, duration and zones of irrigation. Also you can add a rain sensor so that your sprinklers are automatically turned off when it is raining.
Alternatively a horticultural smart irrigation controller will modify the watering times and duration to specific plant needs. This not only optimises water consumption eliminating waste but also improves plant growth and yields. The latest systems are connected to their own mini weather station. This provides details of temperature, sunlight, humidity and soil moisture levels. Irrigation schedules are then automatically adjusted because the unit takes into account changing weather conditions - specifically evapotranspiration (ET) and rainfall (ET is the amount of water lost from the soil through evaporation plus the plant's water loss, both of which are dramatically affected by weather conditions). Maybe that is technical overkill for the average homeowner who just wants to know how to make a sprinkler system more efficient and cost effective.
Credit: Amazon
One of the easiest sprinkler control systems to use on the market is T he Irrigation Caddy (IC) device. Basically this is very simple to set up and control ethernet based irrigation control system. The clever thing about this system is that it allows the user to control and schedule an irrigation system from any computer with a web browser. No special software or clients are required, just a Web Browser on a computer. The Irrigation Caddy is controlled via a web browser, whether the browser is in a computer, an iPhone, iPad, or any http://www.american-lawns.com/grasses/augustine.html other web enabled device, you can control this from anywhere in the world so long as you have internet access. The device has a number of key features and benefits:
The User Interface is easy to use.
The user interface is friendly and intuitive so anyone can use the IrrigationCaddy, no training or lengthy manuals are required. If you can order something from Amazon with a few clicks this is th e same, even technophobes will love it. No fiddly dials and knobs to push and click.
There is an option for Multiple Programs
As standard there are 3 main scheduling programs, plus one other program called "Run Now". This is really useful if you are doing maintenance on your sprinklers and want to check that you have positioned them properly. The programs can be scheduled to run at any time. You can select time, duration and even at what frequency if you don't want a daily schedule you can select what you want. Once you have set up the schedules, the revised programs can be saved, the IrrigationCaddy will store them in its non volatile memory, so even if you switch off or lose power for some reason all is well.
For ease of use the 10 Zones can be Assigned Names
The watering zones can be named. You no longer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhxCu6cQBMs have to remember which number goes with which zo ne. If you have a master valve system then zone 10 is automatically allocated to the master valve.
You can have Multiple Start Times
Each program can be assigned multiple start times each day. You are not limited to one or two sessions each day in fact there are a maximum of five individual start times. This is a great really useful and convenient feature which will means you can set the program once, and then start it several times during the day when you want.
Totally Flexible Daily Scheduling
Unlike the old systems you may have seen or used the programs can be scheduled to run on even - days, odd - days, or every set number of days, and you can also specify exactly which days the particular program should be run. Even if you Water Supply Company imposes special watering restrictions you can easily set this up with a few simple clicks on the control screen.
Easy and Convenient Time Setting and Adjusting Control Features
On the Control Screen interface the time settings can be easily adjusted by simply moving a slider. Almost like using Google Calendar. Also these 'sliders' are a great feature if you are on your iPhone, iPad or any touch screen device. This means the time can be changed visually so you don't need to type anything, or even enter any numbers.
Credit: Amazon
6. Complete Visual Calendar
This just like having a calendar or diary open in front of you because just l ike the time settings it gives you a totally visual representation of when the individual programs will run. You can get a monthly, weekly or even daily representation. So finally there is no more guesswork about if and when the sprinklers are supposed to run.
7. Peace of Mind and Security
to be on the safe side there is a Security Facility; just to make sure for example that the kids don't play around with the system. This allows you to set a username and a password so that no one else is allowed to change the watering schedules
8. To complete add a Rain Sensor
Another key feature is that you can add a rain sensor which will automatically halt your sprinkler programs until it dries out. This saves wasting water.
C redit: Amazon
A Wireless Rain Sensor is very easy to set because you don't need to start running and fixing cables to set it up. Just find an exposed position outside and then connect the receiver to your web based sprinkler controller like the IrrigationCaddy ICEthS1 . One very good unit is the Toro Wireless RainSensor This is a water conservation device which also meets the current legislative standards in states and municipalities that already have enacted water conservation mandates. The RainSensor unit works simply by absorbing rainwater and reacts automatically by shutting off power to your sprinkler valves. Then naturally after it stops raining the Wireless RainSensor will then gradually dry out, as does the soil, then it will reset which then permits your sprinklers to run again on their normal programmed schedule.
These web based sprinkler controllers and wireless rain sensors make a great combination and are not very expensive but are very effective and easy to set up. Why don't you update your system? You could also save on water charges as well.
Remember once you set this up you can control your web based sprinkler controller from anywhere in the world where you have internet access.
The Lawns is a student accommodation complex for http://www.burpee.com/ the University of Hull, located in Cottingham, East Riding of Yorkshire, England. It comprises seven halls of residence (Ferens, Lambert, Nicholson, Morgan, Downs, Reckitt and Grant) and the Lawns Centre. The latter is the complex's catering and social hub. The halls accommodate almost 1,000 students.[1]
Contents
1 Description
1.1 The Lawns Centre
1.2 Downs Hall
1.3 Morgan Hall
1.4 Nicholson Hall
1.5 Lambert Hall
1.6 Reckitt Hall
1.7 Grant Hall
1.8 Ferens Hall
2 Committees and responsibilities
3 References
4 External links
Description
The Lawns halls are set in 40 acres (16ha) of landscaped parkland, dominated by large sports pitches. There is also a large car park on site and a police station at the main entrance .
Of the seven halls on the site, Ferens is of a traditional rectangular 'Sandhurst block style' with the accommodation around three sides of a central lawn. It is somewhat isolated from the other halls both by its location and by a natural screen of trees. Each of the other halls, which were designed by the architectural firm Gillespie, Kidd and Coia, comprises five blocks identified by the letters A to E, and accommodates approximately 140 residents. A typical block configuration was three floors, with each floor accommodating nine students in seven rooms.
The lawns were developed on the grounds of the former Cottingham Grange, which had been used as an army https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzdF7T-Gf6A camp in the Second World War; the nearby Ferens Hall was originally known as 'Camp Hall'.[2]< br> The Lawns Centre
Provides various student facilities.
Downs Hall
Downs Hall
Offers accommodation to 132 students in single rooms.[1] Most rooms have a sun terrace. Before 1985, Downs Hall offered accommodation to male students only. H owever, due to a decline in preference for an all male Hall, at the start of the 1985 year (autumn of 1984), Downs Hall was open to both male and female students. The hall was designated a Grade II* listed building in 1993 and is now recorded in the National Heritage List for England, maintained by Historic England.[3]
Morgan Hall
Morgan Hall was the third hall of the planned 12 halls of residence upon the Lawns Complex. Morgan Hall takes its name from the first principle of Hull University College Arther Morgan. The Hall has 133 single rooms, most with balconies.[1] The hall was designated a Grade II* listed building in 1993 and is now recorded in the National Heritage List for England, maintained by Historic England.[4]
Nicholson Hall
Nicholson Hall
Nicholson Hall was the fifth hall of the planned 12 halls of residence upon the Lawns Complex. It takes its name from the principal of Hull University College 1935 John Nicholson. John Nicholson led the campaign to achieve the college's independence, which eventuated on 13 May 1954.
Nicholson Hall house's approximately 142 students in both medium and en-suite rooms. This is the only self-catered Hall on the Lawns Complex.[1] Most rooms have washbasins and a balcony. In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzdF7T-Gf6A 2009 Nicholson Hall was re-furbished converting all double rooms to singles, updated kitchen diner kitchens similar to the Downs and Morgan Hall designs wit h additional en-suite facilities in particular blocks. The hall was designated a Grade II* listed building in 1993 and is now recorded in the National Heritage List for England, maintained by Historic England.[5]
Lambert Hall
Lambert Hall accommodates 130 students in a mixture of single and en-suite rooms. Most rooms have a balcony. Before 1985, Lambert Hall offered accommodation to female students only. At the start of the 1985 year (autumn of 1984), Lambert Hall was open to both male and female students. The hall was designated a Grade II* listed building in 1993 and is now recorded in the National Heritage List for England, maintained by Historic England.[6]
Reckitt Hall
Reckitt Hall accommodates 121 students in a mixture of single and en-suite rooms.[1] Most rooms have a balcony. The hall was designated a Grade II* listed building in 1993 and is now recorded in the National Heritage List for England, maintained by Historic England.[7]
Grant Hall
Grant Hall is named after G.F. Grant, a co-founder of Hull University College in 1927. It accommodates 121 students across 2 blocks of single and 3 blocks of en-suite rooms. The hall was designated a Grade II* listed building in 1993 and is now recorded in the National Heritage List for England, maintained by Historic England.[8]
Ferens Hall
Main article: Ferens Hall
Ferens Hall accommodates 191 students all in single rooms. It was established in the 1950s as a male hall of residence.[9]
Committees and responsibilities
From the date of inception until 1969 Halls of Residence at the University of Hull were presided over by the "Halls of Residence Committee". This committee was responsible for the day-to-day running of Traditional halls until the creation of the lawns. The committee was composed of wardens, facilities management from the university and the vice-chancellor. In 1968 at the decision of the committee the "Halls of Residence Committee" was dissolved and the council of the newly built Lawns complex (known as "The Lawns Forum") gained the responsibility of term time activity upon the Lawns complex. Financial matters and conference responsibilities all passed to the relevant departments of the University and out of the hands of the wardens.[10]
References
^ a b c d e "The Lawns, University of Hull Accommodation". University of Hull. Retrieved 30 May 2011.
^ "Cottingham High School History". Cottingham High School. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
^ Historic England. " Downs Hall, the Lawns (1103346)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
^ Historic England. "Morgan Hall, the Lawns (1103344)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
^ Historic England. "Nicholson Hall, the Lawns (1276987)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
^ Historic England. "Lambert Hall, the Lawns (1232675)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
^ Historic England. "Reckitt Hall, the Lawns (1103343)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
^ Historic England. "Grant Hall, the Lawns (1103345)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 15 August 2013.
^ Allison, K. J., ed. (1969). "Education". A History of the County of York East Riding: Volume 1: The City of Kingston upon Hull. Institute of Historical Research. pp.348-370. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
^ Halls of Residence Committee November 1961 - December 1968
External links
The Lawns, University of Hull Accommodation
Historic England. "Downs Hall, Grade II* (164757)". Images of England.
Historic England. "Grant Hall, Grade II (now grade II*) (164756)". Images of England.
Historic England. "Lambert Hall, Grade II* (164755)". Images of England.
Historic England. "Morgan Hall, Grade II (now Grade II*) (164754)". Images of England.
Historic England. "Nicholson Hall, Grade II (now Grade II*) (164753)". Images of England.
Historic England. "Reckitt Hall, Grade II (now Grade II*) (164752)". Images of England.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Lawns&oldid=759939222"
HARTFORD, Conn. - Nearly three dozen states have rejected the idea of requiring sprinkler systems in homes by enacting legislation or rules that prohibit mandatory installation.
Home builders, still reeling from the recession, say requiring sprinklers would add to their costs. They have found allies in state legislatures and rule-making bodies that have turned aside arguments by fire safety officials that requiring sprinklers in homes save lives.
The National Association of Home Builders has not taken a position on state action banning mandatory fire sprinklers in homes, said program manager Steve Orlowski, but the group has argued that installing residential sprinklers should be up to homeowners.
Either through legislation or code, 34 states have prohibited mandatory residential fire sprinklers, Orlowski said. Only two states -- California and Maryland -- have adopted codes requiring installation of home sprinklers, he said.
In other states, sprinkler leg islation died or is pending until next year, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Connecticut, for example, is deferring action until next year. A measure requiring automatic fire extinguishing systems in one- and two-family homes failed to make it to a vote in the Public Safety and Security Committee.
Sen. Anthony Guglielmo, the committee's ranking http://gilmour.com/sprinklers Republican senator, said legislators did not have enough information about the cost to builders and municipalities that would enforce the law. Legislators will take up the issue next year only after hearing the recommendations of officials and others brought together Sprinkler System Installation Rockwall by the state Department of Public Safety, he said.
The International Code Council, an organization of building inspectors, fire officials and others who set build ing standards, recommended in 2009 that states and municipalities adopt codes requiring sprinkler systems in homes and townhouses less than three stories high. The regulations took effect Jan. 1.
The National Fire Protection Association has said sprinklers will particularly help young children, the elderly and the disabled by giving them time to escape burning homes.
Opponents of requiring sprinklers cite their cost -- and subseq uent impact on home prices -- and voters' dissatisfaction with government mandates.
In Missouri, lawmakers extended for eight years rules that require builders to offer sprinklers but do not mandate them.
"Our main concern, in this housing market, is that the requirement for mandatory fire sprinklers could cost $7,000 to $15,000 per home," said Missouri state Sen. Eric Schmitt, Republican chairman of the Jobs, Economic Development and Local Government Committee. "In this market, it's very difficult to justify."
In New Hampshire, Gov. John Lynch tried to Sprinkler Installation vetoed legislation that prohibited local planning boards from requiring sprinkler systems in homes as a condition of approval for local permits. The decision about whether to require fire sprinklers should remain a local one, Lynch said.
Legislators overrode the veto.
Sen. John S. Barnes, Republican chairman of the Publ ic Municipal Affairs Committee, said the override vote was not easy because he typically favors local control. But he does not believe any government body should be ordering homeowners to install fire sprinklers.
"If I buy or build a house, I think I should decide whether I put in a sprinkler system," he said.
John A. Viniello, president of the National Fire Sprinkler Association, said the process by which codes are approved is flawed. Codes regulating wiring, construction and other facets of home construction are informed by expert advice from industry and others, he said.
But when legislatures have a role in the process, codes too often are modified or scuttled, he said.
"Once the politicians get involved, it's over," he said.
Later this week, cranes are expected to pluck a colossal painting depicting a Civil War battle from an Atlanta museum that was its home for nearly a century.
The painting, sliced in two and rolled onto enormous steel spools, will be placed on two flatbed trucks for a 12-mile journey to its new home, the Atlanta History Center in the city's Buckhead neighborhood.
Moving an artwork this big is an ambitious engineering endeavor and requires a small army of specialists, from art conservators to crane operators.
And like the aging painting itself, the story behind the artwork, "The Battle of Atlanta," is almost larger than life.
Why was it painted?
Imagine what life was like in the United States before movies and television -- not to mention CGI and other forms of augmented reality. You had to go to the circus or squeeze into a courtroom gallery at a juicy murder trial to find an attraction with a "wow factor."
In the late 19th century, along came paintings called cycloramas -- massive, 360-degree renderings of landscapes, city skylines and war, including this one about the 1864 Battle of Atlanta. The painting was intended as a tribute to a Northern victory.
Cycloramas were about making big bucks, and companies turned them out as fast as they could. Sometimes they would make two copies.
After a year or so in one spot, the paintings -- the IMAX theaters of their day, according to Jackson McQuigg of the history center -- were rolled and moved to another round building to be displayed before new crowds of customers.
Although the heyday of cycloramas in the United States lasted only a few decades, 72 full-size works still exist across the globe, the International Panorama Council told CNN. Not all are on display. China is the most productive country at c reating new ones.
'The horrors of war'
To paint the Atlanta battle, the American Panorama Company in Milwaukee employed a small army of artists -- OK, maybe 20 guys, most from Europe -- to create a work "intended to please Northern audiences" (read Yankees).
The Battle of Atlanta, fought on the afternoon of July 22, 1864, was a decisive moment in the war, and many historians say the fall of the city more than a month later -- during a time the war was grinding on -- helped re-elect President Abraham Lincoln.
As shown in the painting, Rebel troops have broken the Union army's line and federal reinforcements are riding to the rescue. One vignette shows Federal commander Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman and an ambulance carrying the body of one of his favorite subordinates, Maj. Gen. James B. McPherson.
The focal point of the sprawling painting is fierce fighting around a house, with Confederates firing from behind cotton bales. Federal troops and cavalr y are rushing toward that point.
"It is the moment when you are on the cusp of Federal victory," said Gordon Jones, senior military historian at the Atlanta History Center.
Charlie Crawford, president of the Georgia Battlefields Association, said the artists did a good job of capturing a moment: "The scene captures the horrors of war: Dead and dying men and horses, broken equipment, dust, dirt (and) smoke."
How did they paint it?
The artists came to Atlanta twice and studied the landscape from towers. They interviewed veterans of the battle and made sure their paint colors matched Georgia's red clay and pine trees.
Photographs of 1/10-scale sketches (above) were distributed to the artists, who worked on scaffolds under the direction of the lead artist, filling in grids projected onto Belgian linen.
These guys were really good at their craft. One artist might specialize in horses while another focused on human figures and faces. They made tw o copies of the Battle of Atlanta painting, although the second no longer exists.
While they got a few things wrong -- "Old Abe," the bald eagle mascot of the 8th Wisconsin Infantry, wasn't really at the battle, and there were no clouds on that muggy day -- veterans and their families were impressed by a work of art that vividly captured the sound and fury of battle.
"This was a way for the veterans to share their combat experience. This is better than going to the battlefield," Jones said. "When you see this, you can say, 'Son this is what I did. This is my experience.'"
Boosting the 3D effect
The painting debuted in Minneapolis in the summer of 1886. After a few moves and a lot of financial distress for owners, the Battle of Atlanta in 1892 ended up in Atlanta -- but not before tweaks were made to appease a Southern audience.
A knot of frightened rebel prisoners was repainted as fleeing Union soldiers. And a newspaper ad came up with an alternative fact to promote it: "Only Confederate Victory ever Painted."
Cha-ching!
In the really old days, viewers would simply climb onto a wooden platform to gaze at the painting. A large revolving stage was added 35 years ago.
But while patrons might enjoy the recorded narration and spotlights on certain battle features, they never got the full effect of being able to turn around and see the entire painting.
Officials in the 1930s came up with another way to promote a 3D effect. They added replica cannon, railroad tracks and 128 plaste r soldiers to a diorama built between the painting and the viewing platform.
Why move it?
By 2014, the Atlanta Cyclorama & Civil War Museum was feeling its age and attendance was mostly in decline. Zoo Atlanta, which sits next door to the Cyclorama in the city's Grant Park neighborhood, wanted to expand.
What to do? A decision was made to move the city-owned painting into a new building at the Atlanta History Center. Observers worried the old building was contributing to the painting's slow deterioration. A recent visit to the brick-walled, circular room showed some water seepage on the floor.
About 50 people, among them German and Swiss experts, have worked at the Grant Park building to prepare for the move. Many more are finishing its new home in Buckhead.
Officials traveled to the Gettysburg battlefield in Pennsylvania to glean ideas from a similar project a decade ago. There they spoke with Sue Boardman, a Licensed Battlefield Guide who served as research historian for the Gettysburg Foundation during its project. She understands the stakes when moving such a rare and unwieldy piece of art.
"For all of us ... there is no room for mistakes," she said. "It is a piece of history that is irretrievable."
The tricky part
The technology used to "scroll" a painting for a move is a little bit old and a little bit new.
Workers spent much of 2016 preparing the painting. Strips of cloth were added for attachment points used in the scrolling. Conservators went over every inch, looking for loose paint, said McQuigg, vice president of properties for the Atlanta History Center.
Then came the tricky part. The twin 45-foot-tall metal scrolls were assembled so the painting could be rolled, using a rail system with trolleys. Crews installed various pieces of hardware to help connect the canvas and the giant scrolls. There were many steps in preparation for the scrolling.
"Imagine a fl at piece of canvas with paint on it. If you roll it face in, the pressure will be on the edges of that paint. It's going to want to buckle," said Jones. "If you roll it face out, your curve is on the inside. Your outer paint level is going to expand and not buckle."
It took three to four days to slowly roll the linen and backing.
Boardman of Gettysburg said cyclorama workers in the 1880s typically used a pulley system and worked with wooden scrolls that had to be moved as the painting was rolled. It took much longer back then.
Moving day
Officials hope to make it happen this week, but that could slip, depending on the weather.
Two holes will be opened on the concrete roof of the old Atlanta Cyclorama at Grant Park. One crane will do the "big pick" and lift each spool completely out of the building.
A second crane will attach a line to the bottom so that the shrink-wrapped painting can be placed in a horizontal position.
The spools w ill be loaded onto a flatbed truck and covered with tarps. The two trucks will travel by night, when traffic is lighter, on an undisclosed route to the Atlanta History Center.
Then the spools will be lowered on the second day of the move through a hole in the roof of the Lloyd and Mary Ann Whitaker Cyclorama Building.
The real work begins
After the painting is rolled out on a new support system, the real work of conservation begins. The old varnish will be replaced and a new lighting system installed. Jones said a 1979-82 conservation project led by http://www.oilpaintingfactory.com/famous-artist.html Gustav Berger did much to help preserve the paint and the vital supporting lining.
Another piece of Atlanta history will usher visitors into the cyclorama wing. The locomotive Texas, famous for its part in the "Great Locomotive Chase" during the Civil War and its role in keeping freight movin g as the city rose from the ashes after the Civil War, also is being restored.
It will return from North Carolina and be added to the museum sometime in May.
Making a huge painting even bigger
The revamped Battle of Atlanta painting also will get even bigger.
In 1921, the installation crew at Grant Park had a wee bit of a problem -- the painting was too big for the building. The solution? Lop off a 6-foot-wide section of the battle scene (fortunately, near an entrance tunnel).
The Battle of Atlanta also lost nearly 8 feet of sky over the years as workers installed it in different buildings.
After nearly a century, all those deleted pieces will be restored.
(Officials will have to decide whether to keep or paint over clouds that were apparently added in 1922 to cover up water damage.)
The restored painting will finally have the proper perspective: Until now, the painting hung like a shower curtain and there we re folds and creases. When the painting reopens next year, the aim is to return the "immersion" effect.
The Battle of Atlanta will be displayed in its original hyperbolic, or hourglass shape. Through proper tension at the top and bottom, the painting's horizon will appear closer to the viewer, restoring the original 3D illusion.
You'll be able to see the whole painting: At Grant Park, patrons sat on a carpeted revolving grandstand, which kept them from taking in the entire painting at once. At the AHC, visitors will gaze from a platform 15 feet above ground. The diorama will be rebuilt. The idea is to remove as many obstructions as possible and let the painting make its own statement.
"I think (visitors will) better understand the battle, which is critical to educating people about its importance," said Crawford.
Telling an old story in a new way
Once it reopens in autumn 2018 with related exhibits, visitors to the Atlanta Cyclorama will be able t o have a "behind the scenes" view of how the whole production was put together and can spend more time on the platform, looking at every detail of the painting.
The AHC also will tell stories related to the painting, including its correlations to Atlanta's history and the civil rights movement of the 20th century. Officials say the work previously was interpreted in many ways, from extolling the emergence of the "New South" after the Civil War to the "Lost Cause" narrative, which proclaimed the conflict was more about states' rights than slavery. That interpretation is out.
But there's another important reason for preserving the Battle of Atlanta painting, Boardman and Jones say. At Gettysburg, you can still visit the battlefield depicted in that Cyclorama and see for yourself where Pickett's Charge occurred.
Growth and development have erased most of what Atlanta looked like in 1864.
"Since so little of the Atlanta-area battlefield remains, the painting is an important visible reminder that significant events happened here," said Crawford, of the preservation group.
"It makes it all that more important to have this artifact," said Jones.
This is the seventh, and perhaps final, time the painting has been moved.
It's no longer considered a money-making attraction. The painting will still get a lot of TLC as an artifact -- and a very large curiosity.
Is it possible that the American people -- and the world -- are finally about to learn how George W. Bush decided https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox7DicTda0I that waterboarding and other "enhanced interrogation techniques" were "legal"?
Well, we probably shouldn't get carried away by the notion of some epiphany that turned American history's most secretive administration into some kind of paragon of transparency.
It's probably more likely that government officials are finally being forced to respond to the seven-year drip-drip-drip of the Chinese water torture practiced by legal scholars and human rights advocates.
As Richard Nixon learned the hard way in 1974, stonewalling goes just so far.
Still, it's worth pondering the remarkable events of the past few weeks.
Two weeks ago, CIA director Gen. Michael V. Hayden publicly admitted for the first time that the agency used waterboarding in 2002 and 2003 in the interrogation of three Al Qaeda suspects. The technique, which has been used since the Spanish Inquisition and has been found illegal in the past by American courts, involves pouring water into the nose and mouth to create a feeling of drowning.
Then, just last week, the U.S. and British governments revealed that two American "extraordinary rendition" flights carrying terrorism suspects refueled on U.K. territory on the island of Diego Garcia in the Ind ian Ocean in 2002. Both governments had repeatedly denied that the CIA had ever used British airspace or territory for the secret flights.
Foreign Minister David Miliband said he was "very sorry indeed" to have to correct previous denials by former Prime Minister Tony Blair and other top British officials. Prime Minister Gordon Brown expressed "disappointment" that the United States notified the British government of the flights just last week and called it a "very serious issue."
CIA Director Hayden issued a statement saying that information supplied to Britain "in good faith" had "turned out to be wrong."
Human rights advocates have long suspected that the Indian Ocean atoll was being used as a base for detaining or transporting suspected terrorists to countries whose security services are known to practice torture.
Now we learn that the Justice Department's internal ethics office is investigating the department's legal approval for waterboarding of al-Qaeda suspects by the CIA.
That disclosure came from H. Marshall Jarrett, the head of the department's Office of Professional Responsibility. It was the first official acknowledgment that the Justice Department was conducting an internal review of the so-called "torture memos" the department prepared since 2002, authorizing waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods.
This is no small deal. Jarrett's report could become the first public accounting for legal advice that endorsed methods that human rights groups and constitutional authorities unreservedly define as torture.
Jarrett's office has the power to refer matters for criminal prosecution or to reprimand or pursue disbarment of current or former Justice Department lawyers. The lawyers who gave the torture-is-OK advice are the precise targets of Jarrett's review.
The Jarrett's bombshell came as prosecutors and FBI agents continued their criminal investigation into the CIA's 2005 destruction of videotapes of some of its interrogations. It also came just a week after President Bush threatened to veto a Congress-passed ban on such interrogations.
Jarett's disclosure came in response to a letter from two Democratic senators, Richard J. Durbin of Illinois and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.
The Senators wrote, "Despite the virtually unanimous consensus of legal scholars and the overwhelming weight of legal precedent that waterboarding is illegal, certain Justice Department officials, operating behind a veil of secrecy, concluded that the use of waterboarding is lawful. We believe it is appropriate for you to investigate the conduct of these Justice Department officials."
Jarrett responded that he was looking into the basis for the legal advice contained in an August 2002 memo approving waterboarding. That memo -- drafted by Justice Department lawyer John Yoo and signed by Jay S. Bybee, then head of OLC -- concluded that interrogatio n methods were not torture unless they produced pain equivalent to that produced by organ failure or death. It was withdrawn in 2004.
Jarrett went still further. He said the investigation was also examining other legal memoranda prepared by OLC since 2002. Presumably, those would the opinions written in 2005 by Steven G. Bradbury, who is still the acting head of OLC. That memo reportedly gave legal approval for waterboarding and other tough methods. Congress has been trying for many months to see that memo.
News of Jarrett's investigation can only be seem as something of a vindication for him. In 2006, when he tried to look into the Justice Department's role in approving the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance program, President Bush denied security clearances for Jarrett's investigators, thus effectively shutting down the investigation.
But immediately after the Senate confirmed Michael Mukasey as attorney general last November, Bush relented and Jarrett's staff began their review. That probe is ongoing.
Meanwhile, the future of one of the authors of some of the "torture memos" now being investigated remains iffy. He is Steven Bradbury, who has been nominated by President Bush to be chief of the Office of https://www.landscapingnetwork.com/plants/ Legal Counsel (OLC). One of the DOJ's most influential offices, OLC is responsible for drafting the legal opinions of the Attorney General and for providing legal advice to the executive branch on all constitutional questions and reviewing pending legislation for constitutionality.
Senators Whitehouse and Durbin -- and a number of other lawmakers -- have called on Mr. Bush to withdraw the Bradbury nomination.
Senator Whitehouse, a former United https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox7DicTda0I States attorney, said that the so-called "torture mem os", as well as classified opinions he had reviewed, failed to meet the Justice Department's standards for scholarship.
He said that in approving waterboarding, the opinions failed to recognize U.S. prosecution of cases against Japanese officers for waterboarding American prisoners during World War II, and the 1983 opinion of a federal appeals court upholding the conviction of a Texas sheriff for using "water torture" on jail inmates.
Bradbury's recent congressional testimony could not have provided much comfort to his critics. Appearing before a House committee, Bradbury maintained that the Bush administration allowed CIA interrogators to use tactics that were "quite distressing, uncomfortable, even frightening," but did not cause enough severe and lasting pain to meet the definition of torture.
In surprisingly direct testimony, Bradbury described in chilling detail how waterboarding was used to compel disclosures by prisoners suspected of being member of al-Qaeda.
One of those subjected to this tactic, he said, was Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the alleged masterminded of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. He is one of six detainees at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who is scheduled to be tried by Military Commission. That raises the question of whether evidence obtained through torture will be admitted as evidence in his trial.
But Bradbury denied that the CIA's waterboarding techniques were similar to the "water torture" used during the Spanish Inquisition and by the security services of dictatorial governments during the 20th century. He said that no water entered the lungs of the three "high value" prisoners who were subjected to the practice in 2002 and 2003.
Bradbury joined his boss, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, in declining to say whether waterboarding is torture, or whether it is illegal under laws passed in 2005 and 2006 to regulate abusive treatment of detainees.
He did acknowle dge that the Military Commissions Act and other newer laws "would make it much more difficult to conclude that the practice was lawful today," but added that this was not the case in 2002, when the CIA's interrogation program began.
These developments would not be nearly as remarkable absent the steel curtain of secrecy behind which the Bush Administration has hidden for the past seven years. Perhaps we're about to get our first peeks behind that curtain - albeit reluctantly and glacially.
In the aftermath of Nixon's resignation, students of politics posited the notion that the cover-up is always worse than the crime. The modus operandi of Bush Administration has managed to debunk that old saw.
In the world of George W. Bush, the crime and the cover-up are equally disgraceful.
For more from this writer, go to: The World According to Bill Fisher.
Credit: Amazon
Credit: Amazon
C redit: Amazon
. One very good unit is the Toro Wireless RainSensor
This is a water conservation device which also meets the current legislative standards in states and municipalities that already have enacted water conservation mandates. The RainSensor unit works simply by absorbing rainwater and reacts automatically by shutting off power to your sprinkler valves. Then naturally after it stops raining the Wireless RainSensor will then gradually dry out, as does the soil, then it will reset which then permits your sprinklers to run again on their normal programmed schedule.
